Hyper-Nationalism and India’s Foreign Policy

An excessive form of nationalism that prioritises national pride over rational foreign policy.

Key Issues:

  • Suppresses Dissent: Labels critics as anti-national.
  • Blocks Scrutiny: Discourages foreign policy debate.
  • Creates Adversaries: Portrays neighbours as threats.
  • Distorts Ethics: Justifies proxy violence.

Pros in a Globalised World:

  • Boosts India’s global stature (G20, Quad).
  • Enables stronger defence-tech alliances.
  • Promotes policy stability and investor confidence.
  • Reinforces strategic autonomy.

Cons in a Globalised World:

  • Limits diplomatic flexibility (e.g. Ukraine stance).
  • Alienates partners (ASEAN, Maldives).
  • Damages India’s moral leadership (e.g. Gaza silence).
  • Escalates tensions (China, Pakistan standoffs).

Key Trends:

  • Nationalist Projection: Prioritising image over coalition (e.g. Operation Sindoor).
  • Neighbourhood Backlash: Online outrage straining ties (#BoycottMaldives).
  • Selective Silence: Weakening credibility in Global South.

Way Forward:

  • Adopt multi-vector diplomacy like Turkey.
  • Rebuild regional trust like Indonesia.
  • Maintain consistent global positions like Norway.
  • Practice strategic realism like Vietnam.
  • Use de-escalation protocols like China–ASEAN.

Conclusion:

India must balance national pride with pragmatic diplomacy to secure long-term strategic gains.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top